Curriculum Vitae

David E. Huber

 

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience

University of Colorado Boulder

Boulder, CO 80309-0345

Office: (303) 492-8662

fax: (303) 492-2967

david.huber@colorado.edu

 

 

Research Areas

 

Education

 

Academic Positions

 

Honors

 

Funding

 

External

Internal

 

Advising

 

Current PhD Students

Former PhD Students, year defended

Former Masters Students (years defended)

Former Postdocs (years advised)

Former Undergraduate Honors Students

Other PhD committees (year defended)

Other Masters committees (year defended)

 

Teaching

 

University and Department Service

 

Professional Activities

 

Public Outreach

Society Memberships

Reviewing

o   National Science Foundation (NSF)

o   National, Institute of Health (NIH)

o   Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)

o   Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (UK)

o   United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation

o   Ad hoc reviews for Cognitive Science Conference Proceedings

o   Acta Psychologica

o   Advances in Cognitive Psychology

o   American Journal of Psychology

o   Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

o   Brain Research

o   Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

o   Collabra: Psychology

o   Cognitive Psychology

o   Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal

o   Consciousness and Cognition

o   Cortex

o   eLIFE

o   Emotion

o   Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

o   Frontiers in Neuroscience

o   Heliyon

o   Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

o   Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

o   Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition

o   Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

o   Journal of Mathematical Psychology

o   Journal of Memory & Language

o   Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

o   Mathematical Social Sciences

o   Nature Communications

o   Memory & Cognition

o   Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS)

o   Neuroimage

o   Neuroscience of Consciousness

o   Neuropsychologia

o   Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science

o   Perception, & Psychophysics

o   PLOS Computational Biology

o   PLOS ONE

o   Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)

o   Psychological Review

o   Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

o   Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

o   Visual Cognition

 

Invited Talks

 

Peer Reviewed Research Papers (*advised student/postdoc first author)

 

Accepted/In-Press

81. *Sadil, P. S., Cowell, R. A., & Huber, D. E. (accepted). The Push-pull of Serial Dependence Effects: Attraction to the Prior Response and a Repulsion from the Prior Stimulus. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

2023

80. *Nikiforova, M., Cowell, R. A., & Huber, D. E. (2023). Gestalt formation promotes awareness of suppressed visual stimuli during binocular rivalry. Visual Cognition, 31(1), 18-42.

2022

79. *Sadil, P., Cowell, R. A., & Huber, D. E. (2022). A modeling framework for determining modulation of neural-level tuning from non-invasive human fMRI data. Communications Biology, 5 (Article No. 1244), 1-12. (Supplementary Information).

78. Park, J., & Huber, D. E. (2022). A visual sense of number emerges from divisive normalization in a simple center-surround convolutional network. eLife, 1-16.

77. Huber, D. E., Cohen, A. L., & Staub, A. (2022). A 'compensatory selection' effect with standardized tests: Lack of correlation between test scores and success is evidence that test scores are predictive of success. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265459

2021

76. *Aenugu, S. & Huber, D. E. (2021). Asymmetric weights and retrieval practice in an autoassociative neural network model of paired-associate learning. Neural Computation, 33, 3351-3360.

75. *Jacob, L. P. L., Potter, K. W., & Huber, D. E. (2021). A neural habituation account of the negative compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(12), 2567-2590.

2020

74. Cowell, R. A. & Huber, D. E. (2020). Mechanisms of memory: An intermediate level of analysis and organization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 32, 65-71.

2019

73. *Jacob, L. P. L. & Huber, D. E. (2019). Neural habituation enhances novelty detection: an EEG study of rapidly presented words. Computational Brain & Behavior, 1-20.

72. *Sadil, P. S., Potter, K. W., Huber, D. E., & Cowell, R. A. (2019). Connecting the dots without top-down knowledge: Evidence for rapidly-learned low-level associations that are independent of object identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 1058-1070.

71. *Hopper, W. J. & Huber, D. E. (2019). Testing the Primary and Convergent Retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure. Memory and Cognition, 47, 816-841.

70. Huber, D. E., Potter, K. W., & Huszar, L. D. (2019). Less "Story" and more "Reliability" in cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 113, 347-349.

69. *Sadil, P. S., Cowell, R. A., & Huber, D. E. (2019). A hierarchical Bayesian state trace analysis for assessing monotonicity while factoring out subject, item, and trial level dependencies. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 90, 118-131.

68. Wessel, J. R. & Huber, D. E. (2019). Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(7), 26 pages.

67. Jang, Y., Lee, H., & Huber, D. E. (2019). How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall redux: Consideration of recall latency reveals a previously hidden nonmonotonicity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 90, 47-60.

2018

66. *Potter, K. W., Huszar, L. D., & Huber, D. E. (2018). Does inhibition cause forgetting after selective retrieval? A reanalysis and failure to replicate. Cortex, 26-45.

65. *Hopper, W. J., & Huber, D. E. (2018). Learning to recall: Examining recall latencies to test an intra-item learning theory of testing effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 1-15.

64. *Potter, K. W., Donkin, C., & Huber, D. E. (2018). The elimination of positive priming with increasing prime duration reflects a transition from perceptual fluency to disfluency rather than bias against primed words. Cognitive Psychology, 101, 1-28.

63. *Rusconi, P. & Huber, D. E. (2018). The perceptual wink model of non-switching attentional blink tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1717-1739.

62. *Huszar, L. D., & Huber, D. E. (2018). Evidence that the Attention Blink Reflects Categorical Perceptual Dynamics. Kalish, C., Rau, M., Zhu, J., & Rogers, T. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Madison, WI: Cognitive Science Society, 1847-1852.

2017

61. *Rieth, C. A. & Huber, D. E. (2017). Comparing different kinds of words and word-word relations to test an habituation model of priming. Cognitive Psychology, 95, 79-104.

60. Carr, E. W., Huber, D. E., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2017). The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6). 787-812.

2016

59. *Hopper, W. J., Huber, D. E. (2016). The primary and convergent retrieval model of recall. Papafragou, A., Grodner, D., Mirman, D., & Trueswell, J.C. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 1235-1240.

2015

58. Huber, D. E. (2015). Using continual flash suppression to investigate cognitive aftereffects. Consciousness and Cognition, 35, 30-32.

57. Huber, D. E., Tomlinson, T. D., Jang, Y., & Hopper, W. J. (2015). The search of associative memory with recovery interference (SAM-RI) memory model and its application to retrieval practice paradigms. In J. Raaijmakers, A. Criss, R. Goldstone, R. Nosofsky, & M. Steyvers (Eds.) Cognitive Modeling in Perception and Memory: A Festschrift for Richard M. Shiffrin. New York: Psychology Press, 81-98.

2014

56. *Hopper, W. J., Finklea, K. M., Winkielman, P., & Huber, D. E. (2014). Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(5), 1779-1788.

55. *Jang, Y., Pashler, H., & Huber, D. E. (2014). Manipulations of choice familiarity in multiple-choice testing support a retrieval practice account of the testing effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 435-447.

54. Huber, D. E. (2014). The rise and fall of the recent past: a unified account of immediate repetition paradigms. In B. Ross (Ed.) Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 60. PLM, UK: Academic Press, 191-226. (integration and separation demo).

2013

53. *Rieth, C. A. & Huber, D. E. (2013). Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1165-1180.

52. *Tian, X. & Huber, D. E. (2013). Playing 'duck duck goose' with neurons: Change detection through connectivity reduction. Psychological Science, 24(6), 819-827. (supplementary material).

51. *Smith, K. A., Huber, D. E., & Vul, E. (2013). Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition, 128, 64-75.

2012

50. *Jang, Y., Wallsten, T. S., & Huber, D. E. (2012). A stochastic detection and retrieval model for the study of metacognition. Psychological Review, 119(1), 186-200. (supplemental material).

49. *Gupta, N., Jang, Y., Mednick, S. C., & Huber, D. E. (2012). The road not taken: Creative solutions require avoidance of high frequency responses. Psychological Science, 23(3), 288-294. (supplementary material).

48. *Siegel, E., Dougherty, M. R., & Huber, D. E. (2012). Manipulating the need for cognitive control while taking the implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1057-1068.

47. *Siegel, E., Sigall, H., & Huber, D. E. (2012). The IAT is sensitive to the perceived accuracy of newly learned associations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 189-199.

46. *Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Huber, D. E. (2012). Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: The role of retrievability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 962-975.

45. Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L., & Schwarz, N. (2012). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and flow smoothly. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.) Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York: Guilford Press. 89-111.

2011

44. *Davelaar, E. J., Tian, X., Weidemann, C. T., & Huber, D. E. (2011). A habituation account of change detection in same/different judgments. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11, 608-626. (supplementary material).

43. *Rieth, C. A., Lee, K., Liu, J., Tian, K., & Huber, D. E. (2011). Faces in the mist: Illusory face and letter detection. i-Perception, 2, 458-476.

42. *Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., & Huber, D. E. (2011). The diagnosticity of individual data for model selection: Comparing signal-detection models of recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 751-757. (supplementary material).

41. *Tian, X., Poeppel, D., & Huber, D. E. (2011). TopoToolbox: Using sensor topography to calculate psychologically meaningful measures from event-related EEG/MEG. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience. Article ID 674605, 8 pages.

40. Pecher, D., Boot, I., van Dantzig, S., Madden, C. J., Huber, D. E., & Zeelenberg, R. (2011). The sound of enemies and friends in the neighborhood: Phonology mediates activation of neighbor semantics. Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 454-463.

39. Liu, J., Li, J., Rieth, C. A., Huber, D. E., Tian, J, & Lee, K,. (2011). A dynamic causal modeling analysis of the effective connectivities underlying top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia, 49(5), 1177-1186.

38. Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., & Olszanowski, M. (2011). Dynamic connections: The role of processing fluency in affect and evaluation. In Blaszczak, W & Dolinski, D. (Eds.) Dynamics of emotion: Theory and applications. PWN. Warsaw. 60-87. [in Polish].

2010

37. Huber, D. E., Tomlinson, T. D., Rieth, C. A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2010). Reply to Bauml and Hanslmayr: Adding or subtracting memories? The neural correlates of learned interference versus memory inhibition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(2), E4.

36. Huber, D. E. & Cowell, R. A. (2010). Theory driven modeling or model driven theorizing? Comment on McClelland et al/Griffiths et al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 343-344.

35. *Rieth, C. A. & Huber, D. E. (2010). Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 596-618.

34. *Tian, X. & Huber, D. E. (2010). Testing an associative account of semantic satiation. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 267-290.

33. *Irwin, K. R., Huber, D. E., & Winkielman, P. (2010). Automatic Affective Dynamics: An activation-habituation model of affective assimilation and contrast. In Nishida, T., Jain, L. C., & Faucher, C. (Eds.) Modelling Machine Emotions for Realizing Intelligence: Foundations and Applications. Springer Verlag. 17-34.

32. Pecher, D., Van Dantzig, S., Boot, I., Zanolie, K., & Huber, D. E. (2010). Congruency between word position and meaning is caused by task induced spatial attention. Frontiers in Cognition, 1, article 30, 8 pages.

31. Li, J., Liu, J., Liang, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, J., Rieth, C. A., Huber, D. E., Li, W., Shi, G., Ai, L., Tian, J., & Lee, K. (2010). Effective connectivities of cortical regions for top-down face processing: A dynamic causal modeling study. Brain Research, 1340, 40-51.

30. Liu, J., Li, J., Liang, J., Zhang, H., Rieth, C. A., Huber, D. E., Lee, K, & Tian, J. (2010). Neural correlates of top-down letter processing. Neuropsychologia. 48, 636-641.

2009

29. *Tomlinson, T. D., Huber, D. E., Rieth, C. A., & Davelaar, E. J. (2009). An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15588-15593. (supporting material).

28. *Jang, Y., Wixted, J., & Huber, D. E. (2009). Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 291-306.

27. Li, J., Liu, J., Liang, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, J., Huber, D. E., Rieth, C. A., Lee, K., Tian, J., & Shi, G. (2009). A distributed neural system for top-down face processing. Neuroscience Letters, 451, 6-10.

26. Cowell, R. A., Huber, D. E., & Cottrell, G. W. (2009). Virtual Brain Reading: A Connectionist Approach to Understanding fMRI. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. [32% acceptance rate]. 212-217.

25. Winkielman, P. & Huber, D. E. (2009). Dynamics and evaluation: The warm glow of processing fluency. In Meyers, R. A. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. New York: Springer Verlag. Part 4, 2242-2253.

2008

24. Huber, D. E. (2008). Immediate Priming and Cognitive Aftereffects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 324-347.

23. Huber, D. E., Clark, T. F., Curran, T., & Winkielman, P. (2008). Effects of repetition priming on recognition memory: Testing a perceptual fluency-disfluency model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition , 34, 1305-1324.

22. Huber, D. E., Tian, X., Curran, T., O'Reilly, C, & Woroch, B. (2008). The dynamics of integration and separation: ERP, MEG, and neural network studies of immediate repetition effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1389-1416.

21. Huber, D. E. (2008). Causality in time: Explaining away the future and the past. In M. Oaksford and N. Chater (Eds.). The probabilistic mind: Prospects for rational models of cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 351-376.

20. *Jang, Y. & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34, 112-127.

19. *Weidemann, C. T., Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M. (2008). Prime diagnosticity in short-term repetition priming: Is primed evidence discounted even when it reliably indicates the correct answer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34(2), 257-281.

18. *Tian, X. & Huber, D. E. (2008). Measures of spatial similarity and response magnitude in MEG and scalp EEG. Brain Topography, 20(3), 131-141.

17. Zhang, H., Liu, J., Huber, D. E., Rieth, C., Tian, J., & Lee, K. (2008). Detecting faces in pure noise images: An fMRI study on top-down perception. Neuroreport, 19, 229-233.

2006

16. Huber, D. E. (2006). Computer simulations of the ROUSE model: an analytic method and generally applicable techniques for producing parameter confidence intervals. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 557-568.

2005

15. *Weidemann, C. T., Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). Confusion and compensation in visual perception: Effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 40-61.

14. *Rieth, C. A. & Huber, D. E. (2005). Using a neural network model with synaptic depression to assess the dynamics of feature-based versus configural processing in face identification. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp 1856-1861). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.  [26% acceptance rate].

2004

13. Huber, D. E. & Cousineau, D. (2004). A race model of perceptual forced choice reaction time. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp 593-598). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. [24% acceptance rate].

2003

12. Huber, D. E. & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Persistence and accommodation in short-term priming and other perceptual paradigms: Temporal segregation through synaptic depression. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27, 403-430. Appendix.

11. Wagenmakers, E. M., Zeelenberg, R., Huber, D. E., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., & Schooler, L. J. (2003). REMI and ROUSE: Quantitative Models for Long-Term and Short-Term Priming in Perceptual Identification. In Marsolek, C. J, & Bowers, J. S. (Eds.), Rethinking Implicit Memory. Oxford University Press.

10. Colagrosso, M. D., Mozer, M. C., & Huber, D. E. (2003). Mechanisms of skill refinement: A model of long-term repetition priming. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp 316-321). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. [24% acceptance rate].

2002

9. Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Lyle, K. B., & Quach, R. (2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming 2: Effects of prime similarity and target duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 28, 1120-1136.

8. Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Quach, R., & Lyle, K. B. (2002). Mechanisms of source confusion and discounting in short-term priming 1: Effects of prime duration and prime recognition. Memory & Cognition, 30, 745-757.

7. Mozer, M. C., Colagrosso, M. D., & Huber, D. E. (2002). A rational analysis of cognitive control in a speeded discrimination task. In T. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Ghahramani, Z. (Eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems XIV (pp. 51-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [30% acceptance rate; impact rating (CiteSeer): 1.06, top 20.96%].

2001

6. Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Lyle, K. B., & Ruys, K. I. (2001). Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review, 108(1), 149-182.

2000 and earlier

5. Huber, D. E. (2000). Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

4. Huber, D. E. (1998). The development of synchrony between oscillating neurons. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (502-507). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. [acceptance rate not available].

3. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., & Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, Vol. 21, No. 2, 267-287.

2. Nobel, P. A. & Huber, D. E. (1993). Modeling forced-choice associative recognition through a hybrid of global recognition and cued-recall. Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp 783-788). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.[22% acceptance rate].

1. Huber, D. E., Marinelli, K., Ziemer, H. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Does memory activation grow with list strength and/or length? Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, (pp 147-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates. [40% acceptance rate].

 

Technical Reports

 

Conference Presentations (*advised student/postdoc first author)

 

 

Conference Posters (*advised student/postdoc first author)