| Legal 450 Spring 2007 |
Legal Research and Writing | Department of Legal Studies University of Massachusetts Amherst |
| | Home | Requirements | Schedule | Writing Assignments | Cases and Statutes | Grammar and Punctuation | |
|
|
Sample paragraph with footnotes in Chicago style Many legal scholars with military backgrounds support Justice O’Connor’s assertion that affording basic due process to detainees will not have a “dire impact on the central function of warmaking that the Government forecasts.” Lieutenant Jane Smith, an attorney with the Army Judge Advocate General Corps, claims that “resolving the status of prisoners in a prompt and efficient manner promotes security on the battlefield.” Retired Major Richard Johnson, a former lecturer at the Naval War College, argues that the military is well equipped to handle these hearings in the field or at a base, such as Guantanamo Bay, so long as the procedures and standards are clearly stated.” Problems may arise, according to Johnson, if there is ambiguity in the language of the rules and regulations. ______________ Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 124 S.Ct. 2633, 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004). Jane Smith, “The Need for Consistent Treatment of Enemy Combatants,” Harvard Law Journal, volume 112, page 235, June 2003. Richard Johnson, “Due Process in Military Proceedings,” Military Law Journal, volume 12, page 164, Spring 2004. _______________________________________________________________________ Bibliography Cases Hamdan v. Rumsfeld , No. 05-184 ( U.S. Supreme Court, June 29, 2006) Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 124 S.Ct. 2633, 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004) In re Guantanamo Detainee Cases, 355 F.Supp.2d 443 (D.D.C. 2005) Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466, 124 S.Ct. 2686, 159 L.Ed. 2d 548 (2004)
Books and articles Ellis, James, John Brown and Eleanor Gray. The Evolution of Military Law. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002. Johnson, Richard. “Due Process in Military Proceedings.” Military Law Journal. Volume 12, page 164, Spring 2004. Smith, Jane. “The Need for Consistent Treatment of Enemy Combatants.” Harvard Law Review. Volume 112, page 235, June 2003. Other Military Commission Order No. 1 (March 21, 2002). http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2002/d20020321ord.pdf (accessed July 1, 2005).
|
|
| |
| Home | Requirements | Schedule | Writing Assignments | Cases and Statutes | Grammar amd Punctuation | © 2006, Judith L. Holmes. This is the course Web site for Legal 450, Department of Legal Studies. University of Massachusetts Amherst. Produced and maintained by Judith L. Holmes, jholmes@legal.umass.edu |