Dear closed access publisher, Thank you for your interest in my Side-by-Side-by-Side edition. At the bottom of the page you linked to, you'll see some licenses listed. The first one indicates that Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is in the public domain. You might be new to the publishing industry, so let me explain that what it means for a work to be in the public domain is that anyone can do anything they want with it. I indicated that there because I wanted people to know that. It means you don't need to ask my or anyone else's permission to make use of it. So yes, it goes without saying that you can use the German text on my site. I understand why you want it in a MS Word file. That's the industry standard. I'm sure it's more convenient for me to provide that for you than for you to do it yourself. It might take as long as 30 seconds for you to do yourself. One very difficult method would involve visiting the page you linked to, hitting Ctrl-A to select all, hitting Ctrl-C to copy and then opening MS Word and hitting Ctrl-V. I'm sure it would be very annoying to have those hyperlinks there afterwards. You might have to go to the trouble of doing a complicated "Replace All"-type command in MS Word. I realize that computers can be difficult, and these skills can be difficult to learn. I think my daughter would have been happy to help you complete this task when she was six, but alas, she's a teenager now, and sometimes they get preoccupied with other things. I can relate to doing hard work for the sake of publishing. The very project you linked to was a passion project of mine which I did in my spare time. It took hundreds of hours of unpaid work. I was only motivated to do it because I wanted a high-quality version of Wittgenstein's important text to be available open access to everyone in the world, even to people who do not have the money to pay for expensive academic texts. It was so much work that I felt it necessary to limit myself to only six different versions, and didn't get around to posting a MS Word file. What a shame. It feel so bad about it because, correct me if I'm wrong, all you really want to is to make me feel better about all the work I did, by taking part of it, and give it to a translator and editor, so that they can take what's in the public domain, create a new version of it that is your own private domain, make it closed access, and sell it for money, without offering me any of that money. I do wish I had more money. Maybe then I could lend it to someone in a developing country so that they could afford to buy the version you are planning. But let's face it, people in developing countries aren't interested in fancy things like philosophy anyway. They're too poor to appreciate intellectual things. I really wish I could provide the MS Word file and spare you those 30 seconds. I really do. But the computer I'm using runs this funny open source operating system called GNU/Linux, and Microsoft knows better than creating a version of MS Word that runs natively on something as strange as GNU/Linux. So I cannot make use of the 30 second procedure I described earlier. Maybe someone who knows more about computers than you or I would know of another way of creating a Word file from an html or epub file. Unfortunately, I'm sure none of those people work at a publishing company like the one you work for. Some people I know think I'm good with computers, but of course they're silly, since I feel so powerless to help you out and save you that 30 seconds of work. Wait, I think I have an idea! I also just happened to have taken the source files and source code of the scripts I used to generate the six different versions and put them in a git repository. I think I even linked to that repository on the webpage for my project. How smart of me! I think I even made the repository open to the public, so you should be able to visit it with one of those web browsery things. Yes, I know I did, because I remember it wanted me to apply a license to the code. I chose the GNU General Public License v3. I placed a notice of that license at the bottom of the README you'll see if you do visit that page. You'll find it right under where I give detailed instructions for how someone could use those source files to create their own custom version of the Tractatus, including versions that only contain the German text, which might be handy for someone in a situation like yours. But I worry I might not have done a good enough job, because not everyone has the same computer skills, and I should have taken that into account. Doing these things right takes just way too much of that hard work I mentioned earlier. Darn! But the worst part of it is that I probably picked the wrong license. According to the GPL, if you wanted to fork that code, modify it, and make use of it for your own publicly available project, which the license completely allows anyone in the world to do without asking, you'd also have to make your changes public and open source. But then there's a chance someone might be able to use that code to create a version of the Tractatus for themselves that might make it less likely that they would buy the one you're planning, and your company might make less of that money we talked about earlier. I'm sure the people you work for would be upset by that. I wouldn't want the project I put all that effort into to play any part in making that happen. Well, at least you might still be able to do *something* with the materials I put on my website for others to use. You'll notice at the bottom that it says that the layout is licensed Creative Commons - Share Alike - Attribution. This license applies to such things as the SVG images I created to duplicate what was in older versions of Wittgenstein's Tractatus, and the stylesheets I wrote for doing things like formatting the logical content correctly. I picked a Creative Commons license because I wanted to spare people who wanted to make use of my materials for their own projects to have to go through all the hassle of redoing those things for themselves, and so I offered them to make use of my work for free. But I was selfish, I realize now. The "Attribution" part apparently means that if someone did make use of my work, they'd have to let people know that I helped them. That might seem like I was taking credit for all the hard work they did, like possibly taking 30 seconds to create a MS Word file. I'm so sorry! And again, the "Share Alike" thing means that if you made any modifications of the work I did and used it in your project, you'd have to also make it available to others to do something similar. That also might again make it easier for them to create their own version of the Tractatus that might lessen the chance of you making money from selling yours, and we've already covered how terrible that would be. So in the end, I have to apologize for not being helpful enough to you in your very noble work. I'm just a professor in the faculty of a major public institution of higher education. There are people who might consider it compatible with my job description to educate people, and I foolishly thought by making this work so publicly available it might make it easier for them to study Wittgenstein's philosophy, learn from it and gain valuable intellectual skills. But here we are left in this difficult quandary, so maybe I should rethink my past decisions. I'll put a lot of reflection into that. With apologies, Kevin