FACULTY SENATE UNIVERSITY COMPUTER & ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF Dec. 11, 1998, 168C Campus Center Approved: March 1, 1999. Present: S. Brewer, E. Cutting, D. Damery, J. Dubach, A. Gaylord, G. Fisher, M. Hanley, G. Hough, T. Jackson, J. Kunkel, B. MacDougall (Chair), B. McCandless, R. Sailer, M. Wingertsman Bruce MacDougall called the meeting to order at 10:48 AM 1. Approval of Minutes: The Committee approved the minutes of the Nov. 19, 1998 Meeting 2. Announcements A. John Dubach reported that the SIS system is up and running. (1) It is not available for use yet. (2) The Admissions Module will be up in May or June, undergraduate first then graduate student. (3) Modules will be up according to a schedule to be decided on in February. (4) All units will be up by late 1999 and early 2000. B. John Dubach, reported that Internet II is up and running: (1) People connecting from this campus to other Internet II campuses automatically will have internet traffic routed via the faster I2 paths. (2) The earlier policy of restricting I2 use to Meritorious Applications has been rejected because that is not how it has been implemented at any other I2 sites. However, the Meritorious Applications concept will be retained and applied to the faster connectivity or other special options that can be provided individual projects via dedicated I2 lines on campus. Applications for such consideration should be made to Dan Blanchard. (3) The switching on of I2 has moved about 20% of prior Ic (commercial internet) traffic to the I2 (i.e. 20% of our traffic at the transition was with other I2 campuses). This has given our Ic line a new lease on life. In addition the Ic line will be shortly increased from 9 to 12 Mb. (4) Taus should no longer be used but it is suspected that some offices are retaining their use due to the "if it ain't broke ..." philosophy. Business managers must make a concerted effort to collect the Taus if faculty or staff are not responding to the efficiency and improved service rationale. (5) Graduate and undergraduate students should be seeing an improvement in phone internet service due to the campus wiring progress. Time limits are still in force, 2 hrs on 56k and 6 hrs on 28.8k service. (6) With respect to these improved services it would be of interest what the student fees pay for. This would be of some significance with respect to the communication needs of the Graduate Student Housing patrons, who may be being denied access to either the backbone or an adequate modem access for which they potentially have a rightful claim. 3. Old Business A. TLTR update. (1) Copper Giloth reported that the TLTR motion was passed by the TLIT Council meeting on Dec. 10. (2) The Joint Motion will be forwarded as a Special Report to John Bracy, Secretary of the Senate at the Senate Office. (3) Earliest handling of the motion would be at the Feb. meeting of the Faculty Senate. 4. New Business - Potential FSUC&ECC issues for the Spring. A. Library Issues. (1) Margo Christ's Report to the Faculty Senate should be read by all FSUCECC members in relation to our oversight of all computer related issues, URL: http://www.library.umass.edu/presentations/fsnov98.html B. Software Site Licenses. (1) There is a need for a coordination of the site licenses that exist on campus. No catalog of them exists. It is known that at least 3 contracts for MS Office exist on campus. No one should be paying more that $44 for Office-97. (2) It was noted that many site licenses do not extend benefits to students. This information needs to be an item of any attempt to determine the availability of software licenses across our campus to see if it is a consistent and reasonable restriction on licenses and whether reasonable efforts to extend the benefits to students have been made. (3) Item #1 on next years agenda should be to seek organization for this critical area of common interest across the campus C. Revisit Mandatory Computer Ownership by Undergraduates. (1) This will be Item #2 on Spring 1999 agenda. (2) What are the issues of mandatory computer ownership for undergraduates? a. Financial aid implications? b. Why was it turned down previously? c. How mandatory should it be? Should waivers exist? d. Is there increased need? e. What is the impact if 67% of students have computers and 69% of students need computers to do their school work? D. Web site Organization. (1) To what extent is the University responsible for web site content and design that is identifiable as representing UMass Amherst? Who has oversight authority? a. How much is gained by uniformity of format. b. Are principles of freedom of speech and expression involved? b. Can Departments and/or faculty provide their own information that is not part of the official University Catalog. c. Who is responsible if timeliness of information is not maintained? (2) The University Web Site Redesign Project is already helping to identify the criteria for a new design for the University Web Pages. a. One Dean of a college has already asked for a review of their WWW site. (3) This topic will constitute Item #3 on the Spring Agenda. 5. The meeting adjourned at 12:04 PM. Respectfully Submitted Joseph G. Kunkel joe@bio.umass.edu last updated 1/04/99