| Ling 201-B Introduction to Linguistic Theory Spring 2008 | |
|
|
|
|
Instructor: Aynat Rubinstein e- Office: South College 303 Office hours: Wed. 12-2pm |
MWF 10:10-11:00 ... 12 May 2008The final exam for this class will take place on Friday, May 16th, 8:00am, in Bartlett 61 (downstairs). You are welcome to come to my office hours on Wednesday with questions, or make an appointment for another time. ... 9 May 2008
The allomorphy we found with the English plural /-z/ led us to discuss assimilation and
insertion/epenthesis. Together with dissimilation and deletion, they account for the four
major types of phonological processes. We then took a broader look at the phonological
structure of words and identified the intermediate layer of the syllable.
Syllable structure is the basis for the B-language, the Hebrew language game we heard
at the end of class.
... 7 May 2008Phonology meets morphology in problems of allomorphy (handout). Both the Cree /k/-[g] alternation and English /-z/ allomorphy are examples of the phonological process of assimilation. We'll talk more about the nature of phonological processes next time. ... 5 May 2008
Today we saw evidence from Hindi and English showing that a given phonetic feature (aspiration
in this case) may have a different status in different languages. We also learned how
to go about choosing the underlying representation of a phoneme among all its various
allophonic pronounciations.
... 2 May 2008
Interesting examples of phonological rules are found in cases of allophonic variation.
We learned the difference between phonemes and allophones today, and saw the first
instance of an allophonic variation (in Brazilian Portuguese). On Monday we will pick
up the discussion by confronting the question: when a phoneme has more than one
allophone, how do we represent that phoneme (handout)? ... 30 April 2008Today's discussion (and physical experimentation!) of the phonetics of vowels marks the end of our introduction to phonetics. We also did our first phonology problem today on one phonological difference between British and American English. ... 28 April 2008Except for diphthongs, which we will talk about next time, we have as of today learned the phonetic features and IPA symbols of all the sounds of English (consonants and vowels). I recommend re-reading pages 3-6 of the course text by way of summary. ... 25 April 2008
Language is basically a continuous stream of sounds that we produce as air comes out of
the lungs through the vocal tract.
We use everything in there to produce segments/phones of our language: vocal folds, tongue, lips, and both nasal and oral
cavities. The only reliable way to write down speech sounds is by using the International
Phonetic Alphabet.
... 23 April 2008
After the little morphology workshop we did today, we are ready to move on to phonology. ... 18 April 2008
We wrapped up the discussion of morphology by learning about nonconcatenative morphological
processes such as ablaut and root-template combinations. Data from English, Berber, and
Arabic is presented in this handout. ... 16 April 2008
We learned two rules that seem to be operating in English morphology: the right hand
head rule, and the Law of Morphology. Related to the latter, we discussed the
distinction between inflectional and derivational morphemes.
On Wednesday, we'll pick up with the exercise at the end of the handout.
... 14 April 2008
Today's in-class exercises held several important lessons: morphemes can be discovered
only in the context of other morphemes, they combine while respecting each other's
selectional restrictions, and there are sometimes multiple ways to combine them (resulting
in morphological ambiguities). ... 11 April 2008
English has a (family of) infixes and a process we called, for fun!, infucksation.
Mostly, though, it has prefixes (like un1- and un2-) and suffixes (like -less; if you're interested,
you can watch Erin McKean explain
why dictionaries are like vodka). We define each affix according to its form and its meaning,
along the lines shown this handout. ... 9 April 2008We began our discussion of morphology by locating it in the overall theory (or grammar) with respect to syntax and semantics. We defined key concepts in morphology: the morpheme, morphological compositionality, and morpheme classifications. Use this handout as a guide when reading sections 1-5 of chapter 4. ... 7 April 2008On Wednesday we begin a new topic: morphology. Please read the first five sections of the recently uploaded chapter 4 in preparation. ... 4 April 2008
Our second exam (topics in syntax) will take place next class, on Monday, April 7th. ... 2 April 2008Our discussion of syntax culminated today by examining constructions in which words are either missing, or not in the order delivered by the PSRs (relative clauses and questions, respectively). Again, we saw that the deviation from the "basic" structure varies cross-linguistically (recall relative clauses in Hebrew and questions in Chinese). ... 31 March 2008
This handout contains the final set of PSRs for
English, as well as discussion of sentence embeddings (in particular, Complementizer Phrases).
Bring the handout again on Wednesday, and don't forget your syntax problem set too. ... 28 March 2008How do phrase structure rules vary across languages? We saw how to derive VOS and OVS word orders by minimally changing our English PSRs. In particular, here is a summary of our conclusions about Yoda's speech. ... 26 March 2008
We spent most of class today evaluating our syntactic rules of English. We saw that they are
massively recursive (both directly and indirectly), and also pointed out an imperfection
which we can call the "too many trees" problem. We then moved away from English and
started talking about the syntax of other languages.
Bring today's handout again on Friday. ... 24 March 2008
After braving through a 5-way (structurally!) ambiguous sentence today, the sentences
on the handout and on assignment 5 must look easier. Our discussion today was dense,
and the best way to clarify things may be to read the relevant portions of
Kyle Johnson's notes on syntax (especially pages 15-20). ... 14 March 2008
Sometimes it is possible to fit the words in a given sentence into more than one tree. When that
happens, each tree often corresponds to a different meaning of the sentence. These cases, which we
call structural ambiguities, are the topic of today's handout. ... 12 March 2008
Today we finally plotted some full sentences using all the rules we have so far. Make
sure you understand the trees we came up with for the practice sentences on the
handout. ... 10 March 2008
We finally arrived at phrase structure rules (PSRs) for noun phrases that we feel
happy with. These are the ones used on the question in the assignment (reminder:
assignment 4 is due on Wednesday). ... 7 March 2008In the process of writing phrase structure rules for noun phrases, we discovered recursion (and recursive rules) as a way of introducing as many adjectives as we want in these phrases. Make sure to read through section 3.7 in the course notes before Monday. ... 5 March 2008
We learned four tests that uncover constituents in sentences: the pronoun test, the then/there
test, the do-form test, and the movement test. Now that we can identify where the boundaries
of constituents go, we will write rules that capture their internal structure. ... 3 March 2008How would you explain the grammar of English to a Martian? We convinced ourselves that a good place to start would be to have a list of words (a lexicon), parts of speech (to make generalizations over word categories), and phrases. We'll continue learning about phrases on Wednesday (bring the handout then, and read through section 3.4 in the course text). ... 29 February 2008Ready to move on to syntax? Make sure to read the first two sections of the syntax chapter for Monday. ... 27 February 2008Our first midterm is coming up on Friday. The list of topics I gave you today summarizes everything we've done in semantics and defines the material you will be responsible for on the test. ... 25 February 2008I returned assignment 2 to you today. We discussed the solutions in class (I'll also put up an answer key soon). ... 22 February 2008
9:00am: we're having class as usual today (but note that campus closes officially at noon). ... 20 February 2008
We talked about the semantics of sentential connectives like "and", "but", "or" in terms
of truth tables. You brought up many interesting connectives that we will not be able
to discuss in 201: keep them in mind if you end up taking advanced classes in semantics
in the future! ... 19 February 2008
Formalizing determiner meanings led us to consider the question "what is the meaning of a sentence?"
We distinguished between truth conditions (which correspond to the meaning of a sentence)
and the truth value it has (true or false) in a particular situation. ... 15 February 2008
Today we went back to thinking compositionally about sentence meanings. We saw that
determiners play an important role in bringing together nouns and verbs and stated
their semantic contribution in terms of relations between sets. ... 13 February 2008
8:30am: class will be cancelled today due to the late opening of campus. No cancellation of office
hours, I'll be there from 12-2 as usual. ... 11 February 2008
To conclude our discussion of adjective meanings, we looked at the syntactic and semantic
rules of adjective-noun combinations in French
(handout). ... 8 February 2008Adjectives may all be able to combine with a noun, but they do so in different ways: a "big fake diamond" is not really a diamond, and also not big at all if compared to a "big building". We categorized the different adjective meanings into 3 types and saw how far sets can take us in describing their meanings. ... 6 February 2008Today we officialy began our discussion of semantics by setting a non trivial goal: to have a compositional theory of linguistic meaning. I also handed out Assignment 1, which is due in a week (February 13th). ... 4 February 2008
We defined the major word categories, or parts of speech (POS), in morphological and
syntactic terms. ... 1 February 2008To wrap up our introduction to language and linguistics, we gave a definition of grammar as a discrete combinatorial system which is the result of a natural process of language acquisition. We'll start learning about the parts of this system and their meanings next week. Don't forget to bring today's handout on Monday. ... 30 January 2008Today we did our first exercise in linguistic analysis and discovered that we have an amazing but totally unconcious grammar of English in our heads. We talked a bit about the process of language acquisition that has shaped our knowledge of language. Here are the notes I handed out in class. ... 28 January 2008It was nice meeting everybody on the morning of the first day of the semester! You should take a look at the syllabus distributed in class, and for Wednesday please begin reading Chapter 1 (sections 1.1 to 1.6) - both things are found on the "materials" page on this website. |
|
2008 Aynat Rubinstein. UMass Linguistics. UMass Policies. |
|